Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
zerofuku need to get laid, that’s what he need.
“I’ll help you cope with your puberty”
Buddha already won.
But I get the feeling that he might lose for plot.
buddha got that ultra instinct
I love Buddha, but I feel like he would lose this fight.
zerofuku would lose. because his backstory comes first
God Side always gets their backstory first
My man J.C’s been confirmed canon to Shuumatsu!
Yes I also agree with Buddha thought. Zero Fuku is still a teenager when viewed from its behavior.
Buddha is so awesome in this one, and even Jesus Christ showed up. That’s an awesome “battle” representation!
Wait, isn’t Jesus like Hercules? Son of God, born from a “virgin” mother. So why is he consider a sage not a god. I mean I guess either way he would be on human side since he himself took the sins of humanity and gave himself to god. But would Jesus be a direct counter to that Indian God since Jesus can just swipe the misery away?
Well technically Jesus is the son of god, as in a creation of god, not a god. Adam is also called Son of God, but he is a human. Buddha is different as he is a human who becomes god by reaching enlightment before death. To be fair, after ascending to godhood, Buddha appears in many legends as a god, but noone knows what happens with Jesus after he dies.
By the way, Sage is the term for individuals who formed and inspired great cultures in ancient time. (Jesus with Christianity, Buddha with Buddhism, Confucianism with Confucius and Socrates with Socratic philosophy)
Jesus is actually a deity in catholicism, he’s the personification of god in a human form, but, for that to be the case he had to be created by god and had to actually been born, which is why he is, at the same time, god, “the son of god” and a human (it’s very confusing at simple view, I mostly understand it cause I went to a catholic school as a kid, and maybe the reason why the authors weren’t sure about which side should they put him, since it’s probably very foreign to them).
If I had to guess, I would say that in this story the difference with Heracles is that Jesus taking the sin of humanity became him accepting his own humanity, especially in the moment of his death where he said that god had forsaken him, he allowed himself to doubt because of the suffering he was going through, Heracles instead accepted deity coming from humanity, since in canon he’s actually not the son of Zeus, at least from what we saw, but a normal human who drank Ambrosia and became a demigod.
I would actually say that it’s harde to differentiate Buddah and Jesus, since unlike Confucius and Socrates they are depicted as gods in real life, I would say that Jesus would be a god who accepted humanity as an enlightened one, and Buddah, closer to Heracles, would be a human who became a god, in his case through enlightenment.
Well I am quite a irreligion kind of guy so I would like to see this matter in a simple way. Buddha, Heracle, they reached godhood before they died, so technically they live as gods and don’t die as human. Jesus died as a human. So he is a human.
In asian folk lores, one becomes god either by birth or in live, but in my memory noone reachs godhood after death. Many instances where human become god in near-death experience, but none after death, as death is omnipotent. Gods may resurrect the dead, very rarely, but resurrect the dead and make one a god? That’s not something even an all-father god can do.
I thought buddha will be win. Cannot understand zerofuku’s behavior.
I was NOT expecting Jesus Christ himself lol
“Dura lex, sed lex” is a latin expression found for the first time in 533 a.c. btw, it comes from the “Digest” by Justinian.